It’s not everyday that I get to respond to a response to one of my posts, so it’s something of … More
Category: response
Conclusion: Defining “Religion”, Part 12
In this essay, I have endeavored to take a sociological approach to the question of whether or not atheism possess … More
Alleged Bible Contradiction: How Did Judas Kill Himself?
Are differences really contradictions? Introduction The other week, Bart Ehrman and Peter J. Williams squared off on Unbelievable? with Justin … More
Evidence, Interpretation, and Preconditions: Atheistic Naturalism vs Christian Theism
So, as I was (s)trolling through Twitter the other day, I saw a Tweet from a blogger who goes by … More
God and the Problem of Abstract Objects
Some time ago I tackled the problem of abstract or non-physical objects and how an atheistic naturalism is philosophically incapable … More
The Stumbling Block of Inerrancy
What people often misunderstand Christians usually use three words to describe the Bible: inspired, inerrant, and infallible. Now while I’ve … More
Fairness and Justice: A Holy God and an Eternal Hell
Who is responsible for sin? I want to begin by going back to the conclusion of an earlier post regarding … More
Breaking the Hammer, part 2
Picking up from the previous post in our examination and response to Keith Giles’ post “The 6 Pillars of Religious … More
Breaking the Hammer
Deconstructing the Deconstruction Scholarship is an invaluable tool to the modern Christian. It has the benefit of bringing a vast … More
Rebutting Rebuttals: Arguing Against “Same Sex Marriage”, Part 6
Well, here we are: the end of Bob Seidensticker’s “rebuttal” to a number of arguments put forward by Frank Turek … More
