Deuteronomy: Gateway to the Gospel 

(This post now serves as the landing page for the series with post links placed at the end. )

The title may seem somewhat deceptive given that modern scholarship often dates the final form of what we call the Fifth Book of Moses, or Deuteronomy, to the late 9th century before the advent of Christ. In fact, the vast majority of modern evangelicalism often distances itself from what is roughly two-thirds of our Bibles, downplaying its authority and applicability, when the authors of the Christian scriptures use it as the proof-text for justifying their arguments. The contents of Deuteronomy, either through direct quotation or allusion, is one of the most cited books next to the Psalms and the Prophets. Deuteronomy, at least in its Greek translation found in the Septuagint, gives us much of our vocabulary for Christendom. It therefore seems that Christians should see Deuteronomy as a gateway to the Gospel.

Such a view runs counter to the view of an unbelieving culture that sees and describes its contents as “barbaric”. They, of course, have no grounds for complaint given their rejection of the God who has made himself known and has made his will known in his law. It is essentially the difference between merely reading and truly understanding.

It could easily be said that the Bible is a cultural time capsule and that Deuteronomy is one of the mementos of that culture. Those living in a modern context, which is itself a relative term, ignorant of the past and everything that has come before, often make their judgments, often with a cursory and biased reading, without thinking them through. Any assumptions made, apart from a meaningful historical consideration, are therefore false.

The reasoning behind such an argument comes from this fact: the books that comprise the Bible, by and large, form the only ancient texts that the vast majority of people come into contact with. Combined with secular and humanistic assumptions, all of which are presuppositionally absurd, as well as lack of historical depth result in false conclusions.

We also find such in those groups that identify themselves as “progressive” or “liberal”. Such often concoct an a-historical and philosophically bankrupt view of Scripture, acting as if the New Testament somehow abrogates the Old, rather than serving as a witness to its fulfillment and satisfaction made present in Christ. For in the Scriptures themselves, we find this testimony,

For whatever was written in former days was written for our instruction, that through endurance and through the encouragement of the Scriptures we might have hope. (Romans 15:4, ESV)

The Scriptures, that are elsewhere called, “God breathed” that were being referred to was not what we call the New Testament, but that which we call “Old”. Therefore what the apostles understood to be authoritative and applicable we should do likewise.

All that being said, I am going to begin a series, kind of a ten-thousand-foot view of the book of Deuteronomy. Hopefully, this series of posts will become a video series that I will post on my YouTube channel, meaning that these will become an outline for that study. So, stay tuned.

Posts in this series:

Introduction:

Origins and Purpose

A Whole New Worldview

The Study Itself:

1. History Reviewed

2. Call to Obedience: Part 1, Part 2

3. Call to Covenant: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4

 4. Answering the Call

5. Conditions of the Covenant.

 6. A Word of Caution

7. A Covenant of Righteousness.

8. A Covenant of Remembrance

9. A Covenant of Worship.

10. A Covenant of Truth and Faithfulness

11. A Covenant of Purpose

12. A Covenant of Provision

13. A Covenant of Celebration

14. A Covenant of Justice

15. A Covenant of Order

16. A Transitional Word

17. A Covenant of Justice

18. A Covenant of Truth

19. A Covenant of Victory

20. Miscellaneous Laws

21.

22.

23.

 

Advertisements

33 comments

  1. something i find fascinating is the lengths folks will go to try to convince themselves that Christ wasn’t/isn’t God. No one debates the deity of Bugs Bunny. Many try to prove Christ wasn’t God. they’ve spent their lives trying to establish Christ was anything other than God. In doing these things they demonstrate at least 2 things. 1. It can’t be done. 2. They desperately want to reject Him.

    If He wasn’t God, they would not struggle with either one. He has a way of being very, very difficult to dismiss.

  2. Which reminds me. Get this: In 2,000 years no one has ever proven He did not exist and no one has ever proven that He wasn’t God. 3 guesses why.

    He was God. He is God. He died and shed blood for the forgiveness and cleansing of our sin. If you doubt that, pour out your heart before Him. Ask Him to show you that He is real. Ask with all your heart. You will make the most important discovery of your life.

    Just recently, someone asked Bart Ehrman a hypothetical question. His response was unlike anything Bart has ever said or done, of which I’m aware. The question was simple and straight forward: “What would happen if you asked Christ into your heart today?” He refused to answer. Despite everything he says, and everything he says he believes, he would not address that question. You know why?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s