An Argument for Keeping the Battle Flag


People do not like to be reminded of their past, especially if that past contains a level of ugliness. Germany, in the decades following the horrors committed by the political and military forces  in World War II, has become almost paranoid at any reference to its past. There seems to be a similar attitude that has arisen in the days following the shooting that occurred at Emanuel A.M.E Church in South Carolina regarding the state’s flag, which is a modified version of the Confederate battle flag. In fact, the discussion has even come to my home state of Mississippi, which has its own version of the flag.

The issue, to me, seems straightforward: what does the flag stand for. Without a doubt, it stands for the army that defended the nation that arose for the shear purpose of maintaining the institution of slavery, the Confederate army. There’s no doubt about this. And that is the very reason why removing it is a bad idea.
Let me explain.
History is a dangerous thing.  It has a nasty habit of revisiting itself on a people in a variety of ways. People who are afraid of history want to suppress it, they want to sweep the darkest parts of our history under the rug and ignore it as if it never happened. That is both dishonest and unbiblical.
It is dishonest because it tries to hide the truth. The history of this nation confirms that it was built on the backs of terrible injustice committed against a variety of people with a various shades of melanin. The honest thing to do is be up front.
It is unbiblical because the Bible does not attempt to minimize or obscure evil. It points it out and calls people to repentance. In the Christian worldview we do not hide from our failures, rather we acknowledge them and use them as leverage to move toward something greater.
The move to remove the battle flag is a refusal to engage with reality, to have a public image that points to our failings and gives us reason to do greater things in the opposite direction of what it originally symbolized. Only the Christian religion makes such things possible.

[Christ] is the mediator of a new covenant, so that those who are called may receive the promised eternal inheritance, since a death has occurred that redeems them from the transgressions committed under the first covenant. (Hebrews 9:15, ESV)



  1. Well, no one is saying you can’t display it in museums to study, or at your own home. The impetus is to remove it from functional government spaces, license plates issued by states etc. because that constitutes an endorsement of what the battle flag stands for now, not why it was created. All it was originally designed for was to be seen more clearly in battle, since the previous one was too much like the other side’s flag, and they kept having “friendly fire” incidents.

    As I expect you’re aware, the cross was originally a symbol of fear and tyranny used by the Romans to represent ultimate dominance, their power over life and death. It came to mean something else to us.

    • There is no biblical impetus to place them in museums, rather the biblical assertion is that these things should be out, where people can see them and interact on a civil level. To assert that such belong only in a museum is to admit that one lacks the ability to be rational and to interact with difficult issues with grace and thoughtfulness.

      • Yes, I would agree we (as a people) show little aptitude for resolving difficult issues gracefully, hence the increasing incivility and political gridlock. However, removing a symbol from government space that has become offensive to many is a rational, thoughtful act, as well as compassionate. If the flag speaks to you alternatively of a noble heritage, you can fly it on your own lawn for people to see.

        I’m not sure exactly why Biblical impetus should supersede civil law decisions. The Bible is an excellent advisory, but it isn’t the sole basis of law or tradition. We Christians are the majority, but not all citizens are Christian or even religious.

      • We have the message as well as the authority from Christ himself. If we, as believers, take Paul’s point in 1 Corinthians 1:18-31 seriously, then we have something positive and reasonable to offer.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s